The Syntax of Campus Planning: A Comparative Analysis of Qatar University and Education City in Doha, Qatar

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63955/BuiltForm.12

Keywords:

development, education, morphology, space syntax, urban design

Abstract

The paper examines the campus planning of Qatar University (QU) and Education City in Doha, Qatar. The comparative study includes figure-ground mapping, land-use classification, active frontage assessment, building height documentation, pedestrian shed analysis, and space syntax analysis to evaluate the morphological and spatial configuration of these campuses. It serves as a foundation to explore the evolution of the ‘campus’ concept from its historical roots to contemporary forms. Both campuses are large. Free-standing buildings tend to compose both campuses, distinct from traditional urban-block structures, with a typical block size that is over twice the average for other Doha neighborhoods (Major & Tannous, 2024). Key findings include that the QU campus developed centrifugally (center outward), while Education City grew centripetally (edges inward). Education City shows more active frontages and greater building-height diversity than QU’s more uniform low-rise profile. Vast distances and extreme summer heat hinder pedestrian accessibility, which metro, tram, and bus systems only marginally mitigate, favoring ‘edge-in’ vehicular access. Space syntax analysis reveals poor intelligibility, as peripheral expansions disrupt QU’s original masterplan, while Education City’s layout lacks any spatial coherence beyond its entry roads. Based on the review and analysis, the paper articulates three theoretical campus models: enclosed, edged, and scattered. Through all-line axial analysis and Visibility Graph Analysis (VGA), we argue that 1) the enclosed model can enhance focal visibility and multi-directional movement, and 2) the edged model can help to prioritize edge-to-edge readability, while 3) the scattered model tends to disperse visual and linear integration, resulting in reduced clarity for users. The paper concludes that contemporary campuses, such as QU and Education City, must integrate elements from all three models as their scale increases. However, they may suffer from compromised walkability and intelligibility if not carefully designed. The practical implications of these findings are significant, as they can inform planning practices and suggest improvements for campus walkability and coherence.

References

Abu Elkhair, K.I., Sarhan, A.E.N., Bayoumi, A.A. (2023). Enhancing Social Qualities in University Campus Outdoor Spaces through Islamic Spatial Configurations: The Case of the American University in Cairo. Buildings. 13(5):1179. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051179.

Aga Khan Award for Architecture. (1992). Qatar University Project Summary. Edited by the Aga Khan Award for Architecture. Geneva: Aga Khan Award for Architecture. Retrieved: 31 March 2025 at https://www.archnet.org/sites/288.

Ali, M., Kim, Y. (2020). Can a University Campus Work as a Public Space in the Metropolis of a Developing Country? The Case of Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. Sustainability, 12(17), 7229. DOI: 10.3390/su12177229

Alnusairat, S., Al-Shatnawi, Z., Ayyad, Y., Alwaked, A., Abuanzeh, N. (2022). Rethinking Outdoor Courtyard Spaces on University Campuses to Enhance Health and Wellbeing: The Anti-Virus Built Environment. Sustainability, 14(9), 5602. DOI: 10.3390/su14095602.

Alnusairat, S., Ayyad, Y., & Al-Shatnawi, Z. (2021). Towards Meaningful University Space: Perceptions of the Quality of Open Spaces for Students. Buildings, 11(11), 556. DOI: 10.3390/buildings11110556.

Alexander, C., Neis, H., Anninou, A., King, I. (1987). A New Theory of Urban Design. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

Atour, R. (2024). Urban Permeability in Large-Scale Developments to Enhance Spatial Navigation: The Case of Education City in Qatar. Master’s Thesis, Qatar University. Doha, Qatar: Qatar University. http://hdl.handle.net/10576/56497. Copies available from the QU Main Library.

Barns, S. (2020). Platform Urbanism: Negotiating Platform Ecosystems in Connected Cities. Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-981-32-9725-8.

Carnegie Dartlet LLC. (2025). List of Where You Can Spread Out on Big Campuses, College Express. Retrieved 9 August 2025 at https://www.collegexpress.com/lists/list/colleges-where-you-can-spread-out-on-big-campuses/754/.

Chapman, M.P. (2006). American Places: In Search of the Twenty-first Century Campus. Lanham, Maryland, USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Dalton, N. (2001). Fractional Configurational Analysis and a solution to the Manhattan problem. Proceedings of the 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium (Eds. Peponis J., Wineman, J., and Bafna, S.). University of Michigan, pp. 26.1-26.14. ISBN: 1-891197-18-5.

da Silva, L.C. (2017). Campus As A City – City As A Campus: A Morphological Approach To University Precincts In Urban Context. PhD Thesis, Universidade De Lisboa Instituto Superior Técnico. Retrieved: 1 April 2025 at https://www.academia.edu/34830699.

da Silva, L.C., Heitor T.V., Calvo-Sotelo, P.C. (2017). How Exclusive Do We Want To Be? Exploring the University Realm in the Contemporary Urban Territory. 11th International Space Syntax Proceedings, 3-7 July 2017, Lisbon, Portugal: Universidade De Lisboa Instituto Superior Técnico, 52.1-52.18.

da Silva, L.C., Heitor, T. (2014). Campus as a City, City as a Campus: University Precincts in Urban Context. The 7th Knowledge Cities World Summit Proceedings, 10-15

El-Darwish, I.I. (2022). Enhancing outdoor campus design by utilizing space syntax theory for social interaction locations. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(1), January 2022, 101524. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.06.010.

Gropius, W. (1965). The New Architecture and the Bauhaus. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Hacar, Ö. Ö., Gülgen, F., Bilgi, S. (2020). Evaluation of the Space Syntax Measures Affecting Pedestrian Density through Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(10), 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9100589.

Harper, D. (2001). Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved: 4 August 2025 at https://www.etymonline.com/word/campus.

Hedinger, B., Berger, J., Eds. (2003). Joseph Ramée. Munich/Berlin: German Art Publishers Munich.

Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hillier, B. (1989). The Architecture of the Urban Object. Ekistics, 334/335: 5–20.

Hillier, B., Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Khosla, R. (1992). Qatar University On-site Review Report (Edited by Aga Khan Award for Architecture). Geneva: Aga Khan Award for Architecture. Retrieved: 24 December 2019 at https://archnet.org/sites/288/publications/619.

Kovessy, P. (2015). Qatar Foundation plans massive golf course in Education City. Doha News. 28 October 2015. Retrieved: 31 March 2025 at https://dohanews.co/qatar-foundation-plans-massive-golf-course-in-education-city/.

Le Corbusier. (1925). The City of To-morrow and Its Planning (1987 Trans. F. Etchells). New York: Dover Publications.

Lefebvre, H. (1974). La production de l'espace (The Production of Space). Paris, France: Anthropos: Translation and Précis.

Major, M.D., Tannous, H.O. (2024). Urban Centrality in the Spatial Network of Metropolitan Doha, Qatar. 14th International Space Syntax Symposium Proceedings (Nadia Charalambous, C. Psathiti, I. Geddes, Eds.). Rome: Tab Edizioni, 98: 2377-2396. DOI: 10.36158/9791256690329105. ISBN: 979-12-5669-032-9.

Major, M.D., Kharbeche, M., Furlan, R., Mirincheva, V., Tannous, H.O., Al-Amadi, D., Albatarani, L.H., Atour, R.M. (2023). Generation and Evolution of Neighborhoods Investigated as Urban System Localities of Configurational Inequalities (GENIUS LOCI): Using Space Syntax to Understand Urban Centrality and Neighborhood Structure in Doha. Final Report for Internal Grants, QUCG-CENG-22/23-472, Qatar University, 1 July 2023. Copies available from the corresponding author.

Major, M.D., Tannous, H.O., Alatoom, R.O., Al-Banai, A., Al-Maadeed, G.M., Taha, H.A., Ellath, L.A. (2022). Design, Function & Gender in a Place of Discovery: Qatar University Main Library. 13th International Space Syntax Symposium Proceedings. Bergen, Norway: Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (HVL), 20-24 June 2022, 347:1-347:20.

Major, M.D., Atour, R.M., Tannous, H.O. (2021). Organized Complexity of the Urban Object. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture & Planning (DRArch), 2 (01-18) (December 2021), Special Issue: Space Syntax, Selçuklu/Konya, Türkiye: Konya Technical University, 1-17, E-ISSN: 2757-6329, DOI: 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2si032.

Major, M.D., Tannous, H.O., Elsaman, D., Al-Mohannadi, L., Al-Khulifi, M., Al-Thani, S. (2020). Complexity in the Built Environment: Wayfinding Difficulties in the Modular Design of Qatar University’s Most Iconic Building. Smart Cities: An Integrated Framework to Measure Smart City Readiness, Special Issue on Defining and Debating on Smart Cities or Smart Buildings, 3(3), 952-977; DOI: 10.3390/smartcities3030048.

Major, M.D., Indraganti, M., Ahmed, A.M, Tannous, H.O., Al-Marri, A., Al-Noami, L., Al-Obaidan, M. (2019). Comfort and Use in Building Evaluation: Information Modeling and post-occupancy in the built environment. 12th International Space Syntax Symposium Proceedings. Beijing, China: Beijing Jiao Tong University, 8-13 July 2019, 283:1-14.

Mohareb, N., Khalil, R. (2024). Evaluating Socio-Spatial Inclusivity in Educational Open Spaces: A Comparative Analysis of Private University Campuses in the Greater Cairo Region. 14th International Space Syntax Symposium Proceedings (Nadia Charalambous, C. Psathiti, I. Geddes, Eds.). Rome: Tab Edizioni, 3: 155-177. DOI: 10.36158/979125669032910. ISBN: 979-12-5669-032-9.

Özbil, A., Göçer, Ö., Bakovic, M., Göçer, K. (2018). A quantitative investigation of the factors affecting patterns of occupation in a suburban campus: the case of Ozyegin University in Istanbul. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 12(2), 98. DOI: 10.26687/archnetijar.v12i2.1611.

QNV. (2008). Qatar National Vision (QNV) 2030, General Secretariat for Development Planning in the State of Qatar, Doha, Qatar: Ministry of Municipality. https://imo.gov.qa/state-of-qatar/qatar-national-vision-2030.

Soares, I., Yamu, C., Weitkamp, G. (2020). The Relationship between the Spatial Configuration and the Fourth Sustainable Dimension Creativity in University Campuses: The Case Study of Zernike Campus, Groningen, The Netherlands. Sustainability, 12(21), 9263. DOI: 10.3390/su12219263.

Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Stonor, T., Major, M.D. (1997). Nottingham University New Campus: Report on Pedestrian Movement. Space Syntax Laboratory Report. Copies are available from Space Syntax Ltd.

Turner, A., Doxa, M., O’Sullivan, D., Penn, A. (2001). From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(1): 103–121.

Turner, Paul V. (1996). Joseph Ramée: International Architect of the Revolutionary Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Nes, A., Yamu, C. (2021). Introduction to Space Syntax in Urban Studies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Major, M. D., Tannous, H. O., & Atour, R. M. (2025). The Syntax of Campus Planning: A Comparative Analysis of Qatar University and Education City in Doha, Qatar. Built Form, 1(2), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.63955/BuiltForm.12

Issue

Section

Articles